These benchmarks provide a basis for comparing an individual’s performance on the Four Square Step Test (FSST) against established standards. They are typically categorized by age, gender, and potentially other factors like specific clinical populations (e.g., individuals with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, or those recovering from stroke). For example, normative data might indicate that the average time for a healthy adult aged 60-69 to complete the FSST is within a certain range, offering a reference point when assessing a patient in that demographic.
The value of these reference points lies in their ability to quantify functional mobility deficits and track progress during rehabilitation. Deviations from expected performance levels can highlight balance and coordination issues. Furthermore, monitoring changes in performance relative to established benchmarks over time offers objective evidence of treatment effectiveness. Historically, the establishment of such standards has required large-scale studies involving diverse populations, contributing to a more standardized and reliable assessment of functional mobility.
